Constructing the Conceptual Framework among 21st Century Postgraduate Students: Thesis Supervisors’ Perceptions: Pembentukan Kerangka Konsep dalam Kalangan Pelajar Pasca Siswazah Abad ke-21: Persepsi Penyelia Tesis

Sian Hoon Teoh; Geethanjali Narayanan; Nabilah Abdullah

doi:10.33102/sainsinsani.vol6no2.295

Authors

Sian Hoon Teoh
Geethanjali Narayanan
Nabilah Abdullah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33102/sainsinsani.vol6no2.295

Keywords:

conceptual framework, literature review, flexible

Abstract

Constructing a conceptual framework has always been a problem for many postgraduate students. Even though the students are exposed to many different tools as well as guided with 21st-century skills along the process of conducting research, many of them are seeking helps to complete their postgraduate studies in stages. A solid conceptual framework is an output of conducting a literature review. The construction of a conceptual framework involves multiple research skills. To meet the requirement of thesis completion, supervisors are always emphasizing the implementation of these skills as well as finding the best practice while addressing challenges of guiding them to understand and construct a conceptual framework. Meanwhile, the supervisors must get a better picture of how their postgraduate students undergo the process of constructing a conceptual framework from their literature review. Hence, the thesis supervisors need to understand a better way for helping them to achieve the level of competency. This study aims to investigate supervisors’ perceptions of guiding their postgraduate students to construct a conceptual framework in fulfillment of the advanced skills. A qualitative approach was employed to collect data. Three thesis supervisors were interviewed. They provided feedback on their experiences of supervision. Specifically, their experiences in supervising and guiding students to work on the conceptual framework were explored. The findings show that their postgraduate students have some problems in conducting literature reviews critically. On the other hand, the supervisors agreed that they play important roles as supervisors to guide and engage the students so that they can think flexibly; hence, producing a good piece of a conceptual framework. This study provides insights on the focused aspects for the development of skills in constructing conceptual frameworks among postgraduate students.

Pembinaan kerangka konsep merupakan salah satu masalah yang dihadapi di kalangan pelajar pasca siswazah. Walaupun mereka telah didedahkan kepada pelbagai jenis cara serta panduan kemahiran abad ke 21 yang berkaitan di sepanjang proses pengendalian kajian, ramai di antara masih memerlukan bantuan untuk menyempurnakan pengajian. Kerangka konsep merupakan hasilan penulisan dari tinjauan literatur. Jelasnya, pembinaan kerangka konsep melibatkan pelbagai kemahiran kajian. Untuk membolehkan pelajar melengkapi tesis,penyelia selalu menekankan penggunaan kemahiran ini dan menemukan pelaksanaan yang bagus semasa menandatangani cabaran dalam membantu mereka dalam membina kerangka konsep. Di samping itu, adalah penting bagi penyelia untuk memahami bagaimana pelajar mereka melalui process pembinaan kerangka konsep dari tinjauan kajian. Maka, penyelia perlu memahami cara untuk mencapai tahap kompetensi tersebut. Kajian ini bertujuan memahami persepsi penyelia dalam membantu pelajar-pelajar membina kerangka konsep dengan kemahiran yang berkaitan dan canggih. Kaedah qualitative telah digunakan untuk kutipan data. Tiga orang penyelia telah ditemuduga. Mereka talah memberikan maklumbalas tentang pengalaman dalam penyeliaan, terutamanya pengalaman menyelia kerangka konsep. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa pelajar-pelajar menghadapi masalah pengendalikan penulisan tinjauan literatur secara kritikal. Di samping itu, penyelia bersetuju mereka memainkan peranan yang penting untuk melibatkan pelajar-pelajar dalam pemikiran fleksibel dan seterusnya menghasilkan kerangka konsep yang tepat. Kajian ini memberikan gambaran untuk aspek perkembangan kemahiran dalam pembinaan kerangka konsep di kalangan pasca siswazah

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajjawi, R., Dracup, M., Zacharias, N., Bennett, S., & Boud, D. (2020). Persisting students’ explanations of and emotional responses to academic failure. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(2), 185-199.

Albay, E. M. (2019). Analyzing the effects of the problem solving approach to the performance and attitude of first year university students. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 1(1), 100006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2019.100006

Albay, E. M., & Eisma, D. V. (2021). Performance task assessment supported by the design thinking process: Results from a true experimental research. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100116

Ananiadou, K. and Claro, M. (2009). 21st Century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD Countries. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 41, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/218525261154

Bakhou, B., & Bouhania, B. (2020). A qualitative Inquiry into the difficulties experienced by Algerian EFL master students in thesis writing:‘Language is not the Only Problem’. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 11(2), 243-257.

Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Springer Netherlands.

Bitchener, J., & Basturkmen, H. (2006). Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(1), 4–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2005.10.002

Blaikie, N. W. H. (2000). Designing social research: The logic of anticipation. Cambridge, UK: Polity

Bolderston, A. (2008). Writing an effective literature review. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 39(2), 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2008.04.009

Brockbank, A., & McGill, I. (2007). Facilitating reflective learning in higher education. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Christmals, C. D., & Gross, J. J. (2017). An integrative literature review framework for postgraduate nursing research reviews. European Journal of Research in Medical Sciences 5(1), 7-15.

Denicolo, P., Duke, D., & Reeves, J. (2016). Researcher development and skills training within the context of postgraduate programs. Education. 10.1093/OBO/9780199756810-0174

Fong, L. L., Sidhu, G. K., & Fook, C. Y. (2014). Exploring 21st century skills among postgraduates in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 130-138. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1406

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to desIgn and evaluate research In educatIon (8th ed.). New York: Mc Graw HIll.

Ho, M. C. (2013). The difficulties in disciplinary research writing: A case study of first year graduate students in Taiwan. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 2(4), 77-87

Hoon, T. S., Narayanan, G., & Sidhu, G. K. (2019). Motivation to graduate on time: A case study in Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 27(4), 2417-2439.

Kivunja, C. (2018). Distinguishing between theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework: A systematic review of lessons from the field. International Journal of Higher Education, 7(6), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v7n6p44

Lester, F. (2005). On the theoretical, conceptual, and philosophical foundations for research in mathematics education. ZDM, 37(6), 457-467.

McGaghie, W. C., Bordage, G., & Shea, J. A. (2001). Problem statement, conceptual framework, and research question. Academic medicine, 76(9), 923-924.

Ngulube, P., Mathipa, ER & Gumbo, MT. (2015). Theoretical and conceptual framework in the social sciences, in Mathipa, ER & Gumbo, MT. (eds). Addressing research challenges: Making headway in developing researchers. Mosala-MASEDI Publishers & Booksellers cc: Noordywk, pp. 43-66

Ngulube, P. (2020). Theory and theorising in information science scholarship. In Handbook of research on connecting research methods for information science research (pp. 18-39). IGI Global. 10.4018/978-1-7998-1471-9.ch002

Pautasso, M. (2019). The structure and conduct of a narrative literature review. In Anastasia Arynchyna, Marios Loukas, Anthony V. D'Antoni, Sandra M. Buerger, Marion Karl,R. Shane Tubbs. A Guide to the Scientific Career: Virtues, Communication, Research and Academic Writing, 299-310. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118907283.ch31

Ravitch, S.M., & Riggan, M. (2017). Reason & rigor: How conceptual frameworks guide research (2nd). Thousans Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of action research: Concise paperback edition. Sage.

Shaw, P. (1991). Science research students’ composing processes. English for Specific Purposes, 10(3), 189–206.

Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Methods for Business. A Skill Building Approach (4th ed., pp. 21-23). Singapore: John Wiley & Sons

Turiman, P., Wook, T. S. M. T., & Osman, K. (2019). 21 st Century Skills Mastery Amongst Science Foundation Programme Students. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol, 9(1), 46.

Wrahatnolo, T. & Munoto (2018, January). 21st centuries skill implication on educational system. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing.