A Comparative Study on Reading Questions in EFL Textbooks for Level Ten, entitled “Bahasa Inggris SMA/MA/SMK/MAK” and “Pathway to English for SMA/MA”
Kajian Perbandingan Soalan Membaca di dalam Buku Teks EFL bagi Tahap 10, bertajuk “Bahasa Inggris SMA/MA/SMK/MAK” dan “Pathway to English for SMA/MA”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33102/sainsinsani.vol7no2.477Keywords:
EFL textbooks, Reading questions, Reading skills, Revised Bloom’s TaxonomyAbstract
Abstract: Reading questions in the English textbooks are generally used as the techniques to improve reading comprehension and evaluate critical thinking skills development of students. This study aims to compare the reading questions in EFL (English for Foreign Language) textbooks in Indonesia for level/ Grade 10 (X). Specifically, it analyzes the skills and the levels of reading questions in the EFL textbooks for level ten which are “Bahasa Inggris SMA/MA/SMK/MAK” and “Pathway to English for SMA/MA”. It uses a content analysis approach to collect, analyze, and classify the reading questions according to the reading skills of Phillips (2003) and the levels of cognitive domain of revised Bloom’s Taxonomy of Anderson et al. (2001). The findings show that (1) the reading comprehension questions in the two English textbooks similarly cover all skills of reading questions that ask idea of the passages, direct answers, indirect answers, vocabulary, and overall review of the passages and also questions about readers’ opinion; (2) the skills of reading questions are in the levels of ‘remember’, ‘understand’, ‘apply’, ‘analyze’ and ‘evaluate’. The level of ‘create’ is not found. Finally, the skills of reading questions in both of the two English textbooks equally show that the frequency and percentage of low-order thinking skills are higher than high-order thinking skills.
Abstrak: Soalan membaca dalam buku teks Bahasa Inggeris secara amnya digunakan sebagai teknik untuk meningkatkan kefahaman bacaan dan menilai perkembangan kemahiran berfikir kritis pelajar. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan soalan membaca teks pada buku teks EFL bagi tahap 10 (X) di Indonesia. Secara khusus, ia menganalisis kemahiran dan tahap soalan membaca di dalam buku teks “Bahasa Inggris SMA/MA/SMK/MAK” and “Pathway to English for SMA/MA”. Ia menggunakan pendekatan analisis kandungan untuk mengumpul, menganalisis, dan mengelaskan soalan membaca mengikut kemahiran membaca Phillips (2003) dan tahap domain kognitif Taksonomi Bloom yang disemak semula Anderson et al., (2001). Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa (1) soalan pemahaman bacaan dalam kedua-dua buku teks bahasa Inggeris meliputi semua kemahiran membaca soalan yang menanyakan idea tentang petikan, jawapan terarah, jawapan tidak langsung, perbendaharaan kata, dan ulasan keseluruhan petikan dan juga soalan tentang pendapat pembaca; (2) kemahiran membaca soalan adalah dalam peringkat mengingat, memahami, mengaplikasi, menganalisis dan menilai. Tahap mencipta atau menghasilkan tidak ditemui. Akhir sekali, kemahiran membaca soalan kedua-dua buku teks bahasa Inggeris menunjukkan bahawa kekerapan dan peratusan kemahiran berfikir aras rendah adalah lebih tinggi daripada kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi.
Downloads
References
Alrajafi, G. (2021). The use of English in Indonesia: status and influence. SIGEH ELT: Journal of Literature and Linguistics, 1(1), 1-10.
Amalya, R., Anugerahwati, M., & Yaniafari, R. (2020). An analysis of reading comprehension questions based on Barrett’s Taxonomy of an English coursebook entitled Bright for Eight Graders. NEELLS Proceedings National English Education, Language, and Literature Seminar.
Anderson, L., Krathwohl, D., Airasian, P., Cruickshank, K., Mayer, R., Pintrich, P., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing a revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L., Sorensen, C., & Walker, D. (2014). Introduction to research in education –9th edition. Wadsworth Cengage Learning
Balan, S., Katenga, J., & Simon, A. (2019). Reading habits and their influence on academic achievement among students at Asia Pacific International University. Proceedings International Scholars Conference, 1490–1516. https://doi.org/10.35974/isc.v7i1.928
Bojovic, M. (2010). Reading skills and reading comprehension in English for specific purposes [Conference]. The International Language Conference on the Importance of Learning Professional Foreign Language for Communication between Cultures, Celje, Slovenia.
Brown, H., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles an interactive approach to language pedagogy – 4th edition. Pearson Education, Inc.
Chusni, M., Saputro, S., Suranto, S., & Rahardjo, S. (2020). Review of critical thinking skill in Indonesia: preparation of the 21st century learner. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(9), 1230–1235. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.09.223
Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Macmillan Heinemann.
Damanik, S., & Zainil, Y. (2019). The analysis of reading comprehension questions in English textbook by using higher order thinking skill at grade X of SMAN Padang. Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(1), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v8i1.103501
Dyah, M. (2009). Analyzing the multiple-choice items of the reading test in senior high school national examination. Sanata Dharma University.
Febrina, F., Usman, B., & Muslem, A. (2019). Analysis of reading comprehension questions by using revised Blooms’ Taxonomy on higher order thinking skill (HOTS). English Education Journal (EEJ), 10(1), 1–15.
Freahat, N., & Smadi, O. (2014). Lower-order and higher-order reading questions in secondary and university level EFL textbooks in Jordan. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(9), 1804–1813. https://doi.org/10.4304/tps.4.9.1804-1813
Geng, H. (2021). Redefining the Role of Teachers in Developing Critical Thinking Within the Digital Era. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Modern Educational Technology and Social Sciences (ICMETSS 2021), 573, 18-21. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210824.005
Harmer, J. (2015). The practice of English language teaching – 5th edition. Pearson Education Limited.
Hidayati, M., Inderawati, R., & Leoneto, B. (2020). The correlations among critical thinking skills, critical reading skills, and reading comprehension. English Review: Journal of English Education, 9(1), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v9i1.3780
Irma, R. (2017). Overview of English national examination in Indonesia in relation to standardized test. English Empower: Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 2(1), 42–47.
Ivone, F.M. (2005). Teaching English as a Foreign Language in Indonesia: The Urge to Improve Classroom Vocabulary Instruction. TEFLIN Journal, 16(2), 196-108.
Johnson, A. (2008). Teaching reading and writing: a guide book for tutoring and remediating students. Rowman & Littlefield Education.
Kamgar, N., & Jadidi, E. (2016). Exploring the Relationship of Iranian EFL Learners Critical Thinking and Self-regulation with their Reading Comprehension Ability. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 776–783. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.105
Lauder, A. (2008). The Status and Function of English in Indonesia: A Review of Key Factors. Makara, Social Humaniora Journal, 12(1), 9-20.
Lie, A. (2007). Education Policy and EFL Curriculum in Indonesia: Between the Commitment to Competence and the Quest for Higher Test Scores. TEFLIN Journal, 18(1), 1-14.
Lumepa, R.A., Tuna, J.R., & Andries, F.A. (2021). Readibility assessemnt of reading texts in pathway to english for SMA/MA grade X. KOMPETENSI: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Seni, 1(4), 408-420.
Miterianifa, M., Ashadi, A., Saputro, S., & Suciati, S. (2021). Higher order thinking skills in the 21st century: critical thinking. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Social Science, Humanities, Education and Society Development, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.30-11-2020.2303766
Nurhanifah, D., and Widayati, S. (2005). The Problems of Second Grade Students of SMPN 4 Malang in Learning English and the Efforts Made to Overcome Them. TEFLIN Journal, 16 (3), 1-10.
Pang, E., Muaka, A., Bernbardt, E., & Kamil, M. (2003). Teaching reading. Sadag Bellegarde.
Phillips, D. (2003). Longman preparation course for the TOEFL test. Pearson Longman.
Popoola, G., Amoo, O., Umar, O., Popoola, A., & Olatunji, O. (2021). Influence of reading habit on student academic performance in a senior second school in Ibadan. In C. McCray (Ed.), Multifaceted strategies for social-emotional learning and whole learner education (pp. 141–162). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4906-3.ch007
Rahmadhani, R. (2015). An analysis on levels of reading comprehension questions in reading texts for the third grade students of SMPN 1 Balikpapan - graduate thesis. Mulawarman University Press.
Richards, J. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching & applied linguistics – 4th edition. Pearson.
Rochman, S. (2003). Indonesian Students Misconception in Using Present Perfect Tense to Write Composition. Celt Journal, 3(2), 95-104.
Safitri, M., & Tyas, A. (2019). An analysis of English textbook entitled Bahasa Inggris SMA/ MA/ SMK/ MAK/ Kelas X. Journal of English Education Society, 4(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v4i1.1777
Sahiruddin, S., Junining, E., Ubaidillah, M., & Len, M. (2021). Does reading correlate with students’ critical thinking? A bridge to literacy practices. International Conference on Madrasah Reform, 367–373. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220104.054
Saleh, S. (2019). Critical thinking as a 21st century skill: Conceptions, implementation and challenges in the EFL classroom. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 4(1), 1–16.
Snow, C. (2002). Reading for Understanding: Toward an R and D Program in Reading Comprehension. Rand Education Publisher.
Soe’oed, R. (2014). Mengapa banyak orang pandai tapi tidak kritis. Penerbit Kalika.
Stanley, T., & Moore, B. (2013). Critical thinking and formative assessments: Increasing the Rigor in your classroom. Routledge.
Sudawarti, T., & Grace, E. (2016). Pathway to English for SMA/ MA grade X. Penerbit Erlangga.
Sunggingwati, D. (2003). Reading questions of Junior High School in English textbooks. Bahasa Dan Seni, 31(1), 84–104.
Sunggingwati, D., & Nguyen, H. (2013). Teachers’ Questioning in Reading Lessons: A Case Study in Indonesia. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(1), 80–95.
Tomlinson, B. (2011). Materials development in language teaching – 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press.
Umam, C. (2011). National examination of English in Indonesia: A validity and reliability-based elucidation. Jurnal Universum, 5(1), 1–14.
Uswatunnisa, U. (2020). An analysis of English national exam: Test of English proficiency for student. ELT Worldwide, 7(1), 62–69.
Watkins, P. (2017). Teaching and developing reading skills. Cambridge University Press.
Widiati, U., Rohmah, Z., & Furaidah, F. (2016). Bahasa Inggris SMA/ MA/ SMK/ MAK Kelas X. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Wijayanti, E., Sutarsyah, C., & Huzairin, H. (2015). The correlation between students’ critical thinking and their reading comprehension ability. UNILA Journal of English Teaching, 4(4), 1–9.
Wilson, L.O. (2001, November 22). Bloom’s taxonomy revised understanding the revised version of Bloom’s taxonomy. https://thesecondprinciple.com/essential-teaching-skills/blooms-taxonomy-revised/
Yousefi, S., & Mohammadi, M. (2016). Critical thinking and reading comprehension among postgraduates students: the case of gender and language proficiency level. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(4), 802–907. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0704.23
Yusniati, R. (2016). Type of reading comprehension questions in English national examination of senior high school in 2011-2015. Muhammadiyah Univeristy of Surakarta.
Zein, S., Sukayadi, D., Hamied, F.A., & Lengkanawati, N.S. (2020). English language education in Indonesia: A review of research (2011-2019). Language Teaching, 1, 1-33.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 Serly Febriani, Dr. Lubna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. Author holds the copyright of the article.
2. Jurnal Sains Insani owns the rights to publish the article. The writer may request permission to republish the article from the editor.
3. Jurnal Sains Insani follows the APA (American Psychological Association) style for all in-text citation and list of bibliographies.