Design Consideration for Inter-Religious Dialogue in Malaysia: The Incorporation of Contact Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33102/sainsinsani.vol5no2.143Keywords:
Inter-religious dialogue, grassroots, Contact Theory, interactionAbstract
Inter-religious dialogue has been implemented in Malaysia by various organizations, be it Muslim’s or Non-Muslim’s organizations as early as 1950s.Often being carried out in the format of intellectual discourse and forum, its accessibility to the non-academician, non-scholars and non-elite is uncertain.If the inter-religious dialogue programs could not reach the grassroots, its effectiveness in addressing inter-religious issues that affected the grassroots is also doubtful.International dialogue practitioners has begun to include number of theories in their dialogue designs to reach out broader range of community.One of the theories is Contact Theory proposed by Gordon Allport (1959) aims at addressing in-group/out-group bias.Therefore, this study attempts to examine the application of Contact Theory in two models of inter-religious dialogue in Malaysia (i.e. Institut Kefahaman Islam Malaysia (IKIM) and Inter-faith Spiritual Fellowship (INSaF)).Case study research design was employed in order to identify the design of interreligious dialogue and the presence of Contact Theory within the two models.Data obtained through interviews and document analysis were than analysed using within-case and cross-case analysis (Miles & Huberman, 1994).The finding suggest that IKIM’s and INSaF’s inter-religious dialogue models did not include any special session that allowed a real dialogue or cooperative interaction (one of important elements in Contact Theory) to take place among the participants.Without cooperative interaction among the participants, it would be difficult for these two models to reap the benefit of Contact Theory.Future research should focus on developing inter-religious dialogue design that is more appropriate for the grassroots with the inclusion of Contact Theory.
Downloads
References
Ahmad Sunawari Long. (2003). Dialog antara agama-agama: Prasyarat persefahaman antara agama-agama [Inter-religious dialogue: Prerequisite for inter-religious understanding]. In J. Awang. (ed), Agama dan perpaduan kaum di Malaysia [Religion and racial unity in Malaysia]. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Allport, G.W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
Alvarez, A. R., & Cabbil, L. (2001). The MELD program: Promoting personal change and social justice through a year-long multicultural group experience. Social work with groups, 24 (1), 3-20.
Arfah Ab. Majid & Wan Sabri Wan Yusof (2012). Inter-Religious Dialogue Models in Malaysia. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah. 2 (1). 7-13
Chu, D. & Griffey D. (1985). The contact theory of racial integration: the case of sport. Sociology of Sport Journal. 2, 323-3.
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., & Bachman, B. A. (1996). Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The induction of a common in-group identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20 (3 & 4), 271-290. Special Issue: International Congress on Prejudice, Discrimination and Conflict, Jerusalem, Israel.
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Rust, M. C., Nier, J., Banker, B., Ward, C. M. et al. (1999). Reducing inter-group bias: Elements of inter-group cooperation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 76, 388–402.
Ghazali Basri (2005), Dialog antara Agama di Malaysia [Inter-religious dialogue in Malaysia]. Kuala Lumpur. Pusat Dialog Peradaban. UM
Gurin, P., Peng, T., Lopez, G. E., & Nagda, B. A. (1999). Context, identity and inter-group relations. In D. Prentice & D. Miller (eds.), Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict (pp. 133–170). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Hussin Mutalib. (1990). Islam and ethnicity in Malaypolitics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Institut Kefahaman Islam Malaysia. (2010b, November). Religion and pluralistic coexistence: The muhibah perspective. Dialogue program’s guide.
Khairulnizam Mat Karim & Suzy Aziziyana Saili. (2008, June). Realiti aplikasi dialog antara agama di Malaysia: Kajian terhadap Inter-faith Spiritual Fellowship (INSaF) dan Pusat Dialog Peradaban, Universiti Malaya [Reality applications of Inter-faith dialogue in Malaysia: Study on Inter-Faith Spiritual Fellowship (INSaF) dan Pusat Dialog Peradaban, Universiti Malaya]. Paper presented at National Seminar on Science, Technology & Social Sciences organized by Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM) Pahang & Pahang State Government, Pahang.
Martinez, P. (2008). A case-study of Malaysia: Muslim-Christian dialogue and partnership, possibilities and problems with suggestions for the future. In Simon, W. Thomas & Azizan
Baharuddin (Eds). Dialogue of civilizations and the construction of peace. Kuala Lumpur:Center for Civilizational Dialogue, UM
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Nagda, B., Gurin, P., & Zuniga, X. (2008). A multi-university evaluation of the educational effects of inter-group dialogue. Retrieved February. 23, 2010. http://depts.washington.edu/sswweb/resweb/project.php?id61.
Osman Bakar. (2008). Malaysian Islam in the twenty-first century: The promise of a democratic transformation?. In J. L. Esposito, J. O. Voll and B. Osman (Eds.) Asian Islam in the 21st century (pp 81-108), Oxford University Press.
Rahimin Affandi Abd. Rahim, Mohd Anuar Ramli, Paizah Ismail & Nor Hayati Mohd Dahlal (2011). Dialog antara agama: Realiti dan prospek di Malaysia [Religious dialogue: Its reality and prospect in Malaysia]. Kajian Malaysia, 29 (2), 91–110.
Rohaini Amin, Ayu Nor Azilah Mohamad & Nor Azlina Binti Endut (2011, December) Dialog dan keterbukaan: Kepentingannya kepada perpaduan di dalam peradaban di Malaysia [Dialogue and openness: Its importance towards unity in Malaysian civilization]. Paper presented at Persidangan Kebangsaan Perpaduan Nasional organized by Majlis Professor Negara, Kuala Lumpur.
Shahrom TM Sulaiman (2004). Dialog peradaban agama di Malaysia: Praktik dan kerelevanannya hari Ini [Religious civilizational dialogue in Malaysia: Practice and its relevancy today]. Pemikir. 37, 21-36.
Suraya Mohamed Yasin (2019). Existing Framework of Inter-Religious Dialogue in Malaysia. Al-Itqan: Journal of Islamic Sciences and Comparative Studies, 3(2), 115-145
The Pure Life Society, (2006, July-December). INSaF going strong: Religious dialogue. Truth alone triumph: The pure life society bulletin. p.6.
Yeoh, C. R. (2006). Malaysia, truly Asia? Religious pluralism in Malaysia. Retrieved March 15, 2010. http://pluralism.org/reports/view/42
Zúñiga, X., Nagda, B. R. A., Mark Chesler., M. & Cytron-Walker.,A. (2007), Inter-group dialogue in higher education: meaningful learning about social justice, 32 (4), Josey Bass.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2020 Arfah Ab Majid
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. Author holds the copyright of the article.
2. Jurnal Sains Insani owns the rights to publish the article. The writer may request permission to republish the article from the editor.
3. Jurnal Sains Insani follows the APA (American Psychological Association) style for all in-text citation and list of bibliographies.
