Perbahasan Hukum Percampuran Manusia-Haiwan: Satu Analisis Tematik dalam Mazhab Shafie
The Rules Debate of Human-Animal Mixture: A Thematic Analysis in the Shafiite School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33102/sainsinsani.vol7no2.500Keywords:
fiqh rulings, human-animal, biomedical sciences, thematicAbstract
Abstrak: Percampuran manusia-haiwan telah lama dilakukan oleh saintis untuk dijadikan model kajian penyakit, ujian ubat, organ alternatif dalam rawatan pemindahan organ dan lain-lain. Percampuran manusia-haiwan yang paling menimbulkan kontroversi adalah dengan menyuntik sel manusia ke dalam otak haiwan kerana ia boleh menimbulkan isu etika yang melibatkan penambahbaikan kognitif haiwan tersebut. Tambahan lagi, haiwan yang mengalami penambahbaikan kognitif boleh mengelirukan status moralnya kerana ia boleh mencapai tahap kognitif manusia. Selain itu, ketiadaan status moral khusus terhadap manusia-haiwan ini menambahkan kebimbangan ahli bioetika dan falsafah dalam mendepani hidupan ini. Dalam perspektif Islam, perkara ini boleh mempengaruhi hukum Islam ke atasnya sekiranya haiwan tersebut boleh menyerupai manusia sama ada fizikal atau kognitif kerana hidupan ini bukan lagi manusia mahupun haiwan semata-mata. Justeru, kajian ini dijalankan untuk menganalisis secara tematik perbincangan para fuqaha klasik terhadap isu ini sama ada secara langsung atau konsep sahaja. Kalimah mutawalid, aadami dan kalbun dipilih sebagai kata kunci, tema dibentuk untuk memberi kefahaman mengenai bagaimana Islam meletakkan hukum terhadap haiwan yang menyerupai manusia, seterusnya dapat digunakan untuk membantu dalam penentuan hukum percampuran manusia-haiwan dalam sains bioperubatan. Hasil kajian mendapati beberapa perbahasan fiqh telah membahaskan hukum suci, ibadat, sembelih dan makan, pernikahan, wilayah, mawarith dan wasiat manusia-haiwan dalam Mazhab Syafie. Selain itu, wujud perbezaan hukum-hakam yang melibatkan perbezaan bentuk percampuran dan lain-lain yang melibatkan manusia-haiwan.
Abstract: Human-animal mixture has long been done by scientists to be used as a model for disease studies, drug tests, alternative organs in organ transplant treatment and others. The most controversial human-animal mixture is mixing human cells into animal brains because it can raise ethical issues involving the cognitive enhancement of the animal. Furthermore, animals that experience cognitive enhancement can confuse their moral status because they can reach the cognitive level of humans. In addition, the absence of a specific moral status towards these animals increases the concern of bioethicists and philosophers in dealing with these beings. From an Islamic perspective, this matter can affect Islamic law if the animal can resemble humans physically or cognitively because they are neither human nor animal anymore. Therefore, this study was conducted to analyse thematically the discussions of classical jurists on this issue either directly or conceptually. The words mutawalid, aadami and kalbun were chosen as keywords, the theme was formed to give an understanding of how Islam lays down laws against animals that resemble humans, which can then be used to help in determining the law of human-animal mixing in biomedical science. The results of the study found several Islamic rule debates that debated sacred law, worship, slaughter and eating, marriage, guardianship, inheritance and human-animal wills in the Shafiite School. In addition, there are differences in laws that involve differences in the form of mixing and others that involve humans and animals.
Downloads
References
Buku
Al-Ansari, Z. bin M. (n.d.). Al-Ghurar al-Bahiyah. Dar Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiah.
Al-Bujairimi, S. bin M. bin U. al-S. (2007). Hasyiah al-Bujairimi “ala al-Khatib al-Musamah Tuhfah al-Habib ‘ala Syarah al-Khatib al-Ma’ruf bi al-Iqna’ fi Hal Alfaz Abi Syuja.”. Dar Al-Fikr.
Al-Haitami, I. H., Al-Islam, S. S., Al-Abas, A., Al-Syirwani, A., & Al-Ibadi, I. Q. (1938). Hawasyi Tuhfah al-Muhtaj bi Syarh al-Minhaj. al-Maktabah al-Tijariah al-Kubra.
Al-Qurtubi, A. A. (2006). Jami’ li Ahkamul Quran (A. bin A. M. At-Turkiy (ed.)). Muassasah Ar-Risalah.
Al-Ramli, M. bin Ab. al-A. A. bin H. bin S., Al-Syibramilsi, A. bin A., & Al-Rashidi, A. bin A. al-M. (2003). Nihayah al-Muhtaj ila Syarh al-Minhaj wa Ma’ahu Hasyiah al-Syibramilsi wa Hasyiah al-Maghribi al-Rashidi. Dar Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiah.
Qalyubi, & Umairah. (1955). Hasyiata Qalyubi wa Umairah ala Syarh Mahalli ala Minhaj al-Tholibin.
Samit, M. bin H. bin H. bin. (2008). Mukhtasar Tuhfat al-Muhtaj bi Syarh Minhaj. Markaz al-Nur li Dirasah wa Abhas.
Artikel
Bokota, S. (2021). Defining human-animal chimeras and hybrids: A comparison of legal systems and natural sciences. Ethics & Bioethics, 11(1–2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.2478/ebce-2021-0001
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Qualitative Research in Psychology Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=uqrp20%5Cnhttp://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=uqrp20
De Los Angeles, A., Hyun, I., Latham, S. R., Elsworth, J. D., & Eugene Redmond, D. (2018). Human-Monkey Chimeras for Modeling Human Disease: Opportunities and Challenges. Stem Cells and Development, 27(23), 1599–1604. https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2018.0162
Koplin, J., & Wilkinson, D. (2019). Moral uncertainty and the farming of human- pig chimeras. Journal of Medical Ethics, 45, 440–446. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2018-105227
Levine, S., & Grabel, L. (2017). The contribution of human/non-human animal chimeras to stem cell research. Stem Cell Research, 24, 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2017.09.005
Palacios-González, C. (2016). The ethics of killing human/great-ape chimeras for their organs: a reply to Shaw et al. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 19(2), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-015-9658-1
Resnik, D. B. (2019). Commentary on Koplin and Wilkinson. Journal of Medical Ethics, 45(7), 449–450. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105499
Revah, O., Gore, F., Kelley, K. W., Andersen, J., Sakai, N., Chen, X., Li, M.-Y., Birey, F., Yang, X., Saw, N. L., Baker, S. W., Amin, N. D., Kulkarni, S., Mudipalli, R., Cui, B., Nishino, S., Grant, G. A., Knowles, J. K., Shamloo, M., Pașca, S. P. (2022). Maturation and circuit integration of transplanted human cortical organoids. Nature, 610(7931), 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05277-w
Robert, J. S., & Baylis, F. (2003). Crossing Species Boundaries. The American Journal of Bioethics, 3(3), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/15265160360706417
Rygaard, J., & Povlsen, C. O. (1969). Heterotransplantation of A Human Malignant Tumour to “Nude” Mice. Acta Pathology Microbiology Scandal, 77, 758–760.
Shaw, D., Dondorp, W., & de Wert, G. (2014). Using non-human primates to benefit humans: research and organ transplantation. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 17(4), 573–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-014-9565-x
Tan, T., Wu, J., Si, C., Ji, W., Niu, Y., Carlos, J., Belmonte, I., Tan, T., Wu, J., Si, C., Dai, S., Zhang, Y., Sun, N., Zhang, E., & Shao, H. (2021). Chimeric contribution of human extended pluripotent stem cells to monkey embryos ex vivo. Cell, 184(8), 2020–2032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.020
Wu, J., Platero-Luengo, A., Sakurai, M., Sugawara, A., Gil, M. A., Yamauchi, T., Suzuki, K., Bogliotti, Y. S., Cuello, C., Valencia, M. M., Okumura, D., Luo, J., Vilariño, M., Parrilla, I., Soto, D. A., Martinez, C. A., Hishida, T., Sánchez-Bautista, S., Martinez-Martinez, M. L., … Belmonte, J. C. I. (2017). Interspecies Chimerism with Mammalian Pluripotent Stem Cells. Cell, 168(3), 473-486.e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CELL.2016.12.036
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 Muhammad Faiq Mohd Zailani, Mohammad Naqib Hamdan, Aimi Nadia Mohd Yusof, Nur Najwa Hanani Abdul Rahman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. Author holds the copyright of the article.
2. Jurnal Sains Insani owns the rights to publish the article. The writer may request permission to republish the article from the editor.
3. Jurnal Sains Insani follows the APA (American Psychological Association) style for all in-text citation and list of bibliographies.
