Bibliometrics Analysis of Research Publications Related to Sus scrofa domesticus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33102/sainsinsani.vol5no2.135Abstract
Halal and toyyib are popular terms used among Muslims around the world. Food is one of the topics that have always been discussed among the scholars referred to as halal and toyyib. For Muslim, Sus scrofa domesticus or pig is known as one of the animals which is haram in Islam. The objectives of this study are to analyse trends related to Sus scrofa domesticus in existing research publications and to show the most suitable scope of research for future research purposes. This study uses bibliometrics analysis to examine the results of past publications on Sus scrofa domesticus related research. According to research articles, researchers found that majority of the previous research on Sus scrofa domesticus articles dominated journals by 97%. Most of the topics studied in the research related to Sus scrofa domesticus basically revolves around Islamic studies while research on the method of analysis conducted in the previous studies found that most studies on Sus scrofa domesticus is on scientific analysis. In the science area, the studies are divided into 10 areas. The areas of scientific discussion of Sus scrofa domesticus are biotechnology, biomedical, biochemistry, microbiology, system biology, agriculture, food science, nanotechnology, pharmacology and food engineering. In Islamic areas, the field of study that focuses on the analysis of the Islamic perspective is Islamic studies. It is found that research publications in Sus scrofa domesticus are more active in scientific analysis, compared to Islamic analysis. Therefore, the efforts of researchers in both scientific and Islamic analysis need to be balanced. Analysis of pigs in the Islamic perspective needs to be more productive to the development of Islamic studies. Advanced new study of Sus scrofa domesticus is expected to produce benefits to Muslims and society as a whole.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, K. A., Yakub, M., Yusoff, Z. M., Yakob, M. A., Awang, K., Othman, R., & Ariffin, M. F. M. (2016). Kajian Bibliometrik Terhadap Bahan Penerbitan Penyelidikan Berkaitan Delima: Ke Arah Penyelidikan Terkini Dalam Bidang Pengajian Islam. Jurnal Islam dan Masyarakat Kontemporari, 13(2), 1-32.
Boitani L, Mattei L, Nonis D, and Corsi F. 1994. Spatial and activity patterns of wild boars in Tuscany, Italy. Journal of Mammalogy 75(3):600-12.
Basuki, S. (2002). Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, dan Infometrics: Kumpulan makalah kursus bibliometrika. Depok: Pusat Studi Jepang, 2002, h. 13-15.
Cooper, I. D. (2015). Bibliometrics basics. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 103(4), 217.
Da Cunha Nogueira SS, Nogueira-Filho SLG, Bassford M, Silvius K, and Fragoso JMV. 2007. Feral pigs in Hawai‘i: Using behavior and ecology to refine control techniques. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 108 (1- 2):1-11.
EFSA working group. (2010). Trends and Sources of Zoonoses and Zoonotic Agents and Food-borne outbreaks in the European Union in 2008. ed. European Food Safety Authority, 1496.
Fadzlillah, N. A., Man, Y. C., Jamaludin, M. A., Rahman, S. A., & Al-Kahtani, H. A. (2011). Halal food issues from Islamic and modern science perspectives. In 2nd International Conference on Humanities, Historical, and Social Sciences (Vol. 17).
Graves HB. 1984. Behavior and ecology of wild and feral swine (Sus scrofa). Journal of Animal Science 58(2):482-92.
Hawwa, S. al-Islam. 1st edition. Misr. Dar al-Salam. 1994.
Hertzel, D. H. (2003). Bibliometrics history. Encyclopedia of library and information science, 1.
Nanji, Amin A. and French, S.W., 1985. "Relationship between pork consumption and cirrhosis. - Lancet, March 23, pp. 681-683.
Prendergast, D.M., Duggan, S.J., Gonzales-Barron, U., Fanning, S., Butler, F., Cormican, M., Duffy, G., 2009. Prevalence, numbers and characteristics of Salmonella spp. on Irish retail pork. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 131: 233-239.
Qamar, M. F., & Raza, I. (2012). Scientific Evidences that Pig Meat (Pork) is Prohibited for Human Health. Scientific Papers. Series D. Animal Science, 55.
Qurtubi. al-Jami‘ li Ahkam al-Quran. 13 vols. Lebanon. Mu’assasah al-Risalah. 2006.
Rowley-Conwy, P., Albarella, U., & Dobney, K. (2012). Distinguishing wild boar from domestic pigs in prehistory: a review of approaches and recent results. Journal of World Prehistory, 25(1), 1-44.
Waithman JD, Sweitzer RA, Vuren DV, et al. 1999. Range expansion, population sizes, and management of wild pigs in California. The Journal of Wildlife Management 63(1):298-308.
Wood GW and Roark DN. 1980. Food habits of feral hogs in coastal South Carolina. The Journal of Wildlife Management 44(2):506-11.
Yalden D. 2001. The return of the prodigal swine. Biologist 48(6):259-62.
Zamakhsyari. al-Kasysyaf. 1 vol. Misr. Maktabah al-‘Abikan. 1998.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2020 Muhammad Najmi Mohammad Fauzi, Abdul Syakur Aqil Mat Anuar, Irfan Ezani Shuhaimi, Nur Fazidah Asmuje @Asmuzi, Nur Dalila A'wani Abd Aziz, Tg Ainul Farha Tg Abdul Rahman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. Author holds the copyright of the article.
2. Jurnal Sains Insani owns the rights to publish the article. The writer may request permission to republish the article from the editor.
3. Jurnal Sains Insani follows the APA (American Psychological Association) style for all in-text citation and list of bibliographies.
